$1.25 Million Settlement for a Head-On Collision Caused by a Work Truck
How a Vacation Turned into a Life-Altering Crash, and What Attorney Eric Beasley Did to Hold the Right Party Accountable
A couple visiting North Carolina was driving along a two-lane road in a rental car when everything went wrong. A work truck pulled out of a private driveway, disrupting traffic and causing another vehicle to swerve into oncoming lanes. The result: a violent head-on collision with the visitors’ vehicle, and permanent injuries that changed one woman’s life forever.
The insurance company representing the work truck refused to accept fault. The initial police report didn’t place blame on the truck. And for a while, no local attorneys were willing to take the case forward.
But attorney Eric Beasley wouldn’t let it go. He saw what others didn’t—and after years of pressure, strategic litigation, and trial preparation, the commercial insurer finally agreed to pay. The total settlement came in at $1.25 million.
This is how it happened.
A Work Truck’s Sudden Move Creates a Chain Reaction
The crash occurred during daylight hours on a two-lane highway. The out-of-state couple was traveling in a rental car when a work truck exited a residential driveway across the road. The truck didn’t strike anyone directly, but it forced an approaching vehicle to swerve into oncoming traffic, where it collided head-on with the couple’s car.
The impact was severe. The husband sustained injuries but was able to recover. His wife, however, suffered internal injuries that led to long-term health complications. It was a devastating outcome for a young couple, and one that reshaped their lives in lasting ways.
Why Liability Wasn’t Clear at First
The car that hit the couple settled early. But Beasley knew that wasn’t the whole story. The real question was whether the work truck—whose driver never made contact with either vehicle—could be held responsible.
The police report didn’t assign blame to the truck. And the trucking company refused to engage. Multiple attorneys in North Carolina declined to pursue the case, worried that the liability argument wouldn’t hold up.
But Beasley persisted. He found a litigation partner willing to take the fight forward, filed suit against the work truck’s insurer, and began building a case for how this commercial vehicle’s actions set everything in motion.
Why Jurisdictional Barriers Shouldn’t Stop a Case
One obstacle in this case was geography. The crash happened in North Carolina, but the victims lived out of state, and many local firms weren’t interested in a complicated, long-distance fight. Beasley refused to let that be the end of the story.
He coordinated with in-state counsel, maintained pressure on the defense, and made sure his clients didn’t get lost in a legal shuffle. That commitment to strategy across state lines made the $1.25 million outcome possible. It’s a reminder that just because a crash happens far from home doesn’t mean you can’t pursue justice.
Building the Case Against a Reluctant Defendant
It took nearly four years to get the company to acknowledge any responsibility. The defense’s main argument was simple: their driver never touched either vehicle.
But Beasley and his team focused on the chain of causation. The truck pulled out onto a busy road, forcing another driver to react. That decision—and that timing—set off a deadly sequence of events.
Through discovery, depositions, and litigation pressure, Beasley reframed the case in a way the insurance company couldn’t ignore. Once the facts were on the table, the defense finally came to mediation, and the case was resolved.
Long-Term Injuries Without a Clear Paper Trail
One of the challenges in this case was that the most serious injury didn’t show up on a police report or crash diagram. The female passenger experienced internal trauma that resulted in permanent medical consequences—conditions that weren’t immediately obvious but carried a profound impact.
Beasley focused on telling the story of what the crash truly took from his clients. This wasn’t just about ER visits or property damage. It was about the lasting consequences of someone else’s poor decision and ensuring that those consequences weren’t ignored or undervalued in the legal process.
Why Commercial Vehicle Cases Require Persistence
This case highlights a recurring pattern in serious injury claims involving commercial vehicles:
- The party that initiates the danger often tries to deflect blame if they didn’t cause the final impact.
- Initial police reports may fail to capture the full sequence of events.
- Insurance companies resist paying unless the liability story is carefully reconstructed.
Beasley’s experience with truck and commercial vehicle cases gave him the foresight to keep the case alive when others wouldn’t. And that persistence led to a settlement the clients could feel good about, years after being told they had no case.
What Victims Should Know About Chain Reaction Crashes
Head-on collisions are among the most dangerous types of crashes, and when they’re caused by a chain reaction, it’s not always clear who’s to blame. But that doesn’t mean you don’t have a case.
If you were injured in a crash involving a commercial vehicle—even if that vehicle didn’t directly hit you—you should know:
- Causation matters as much as contact. A vehicle that forces another driver to swerve can still be held accountable.
- Initial reports can be wrong. Don’t assume the police or insurers got it right the first time.
- Long-term consequences deserve full value. If you’re living with permanent injuries, you need an attorney who can prove not just what happened, but how it changed your life.
What This Case Says About Commercial Accountability
Commercial drivers are held to a higher standard because the risks are greater. When a company puts someone behind the wheel of a work truck, they’re responsible for that person’s judgment, behavior, and impact on the road.
In this case, the defense attempted to justify its actions by claiming that no contact had occurred. But Beasley’s approach made it clear: initiating a dangerous situation and then backing away doesn’t erase responsibility. The final settlement reinforced that message—and helped the injured couple begin to move forward.
A Message to Families Navigating Serious Injury Claims
After a serious crash, the pressure to settle quickly can feel overwhelming, especially if you’re far from home. But rushing into a settlement can leave you without the resources you’ll need later. In this case, if Beasley had accepted the original narrative or given up after one or two denials, the couple would’ve walked away with a fraction of what they were entitled to.
By staying focused and applying pressure over time, he helped them secure the resources they needed to rebuild their lives—and made sure the company responsible was held accountable.
When You Need Answers, We’re Here to Help
At the Law Office of Eric Beasley, we take on difficult cases that others won’t. We know how to investigate chain reaction crashes, build liability arguments that hold up in court, and hold commercial insurers accountable when they try to dodge responsibility.
If you were injured in a crash involving a commercial vehicle—even if it didn’t directly strike your vehicle—talk to us. We’ll review what happened, investigate every angle, and fight for the maximum compensation you deserve.
Contact us online or call our offices in Nashville or Goodlettsville today to schedule a free consultation. We’re here when you’re ready.
Click here for a printable PDF of this article, “$1.25 Million Settlement for a Head-On Collision Caused by a Work Truck.”